4.3 Article

Using Mixed Reality to Practice Difficult Conversations

Journal

CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING
Volume 86, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecns.2023.101472

Keywords

Mixed reality; Simulation; Nursing education; Communication skills; Avatar; Undergraduate nursing; Teaching and learning strategy; Innovation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses the practical application of using mixed reality technology for nursing students to engage in difficult conversations, enhancing their communication skills and practice confidence by simulating real healthcare experiences.
Background/Introduction: Nursing students often learn effective communication through observa-tional and varied clinical opportunities. Role play can be helpful, however, limited by the engagement and commitment of those participating.Literature Review: While nursing has limited data on the use of mixed reality (MR) to support learner development of effective communication skills, teacher education programs have successfully integrated MR to support professional role development.Innovation in Simulation: MR simulation in an undergraduate nursing education program provided an innovative teaching-learning strategy to practice difficult conversations aligned to realistic healthcare experiences. Discussion: As nursing students prepare for the complex healthcare environment, MR appears to be a promising method for development of communication skills and confidence in practice.Cite this article: Hannans, J., & Nevins, C. (2024, Month). Using Mixed Reality to Practice Difficult Conversations. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 86, 101472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2023.101472 .(c) 2023 International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning. Published by Elsevier Inc.This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ )

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available