4.3 Article

Monte Carlo simulation of electron emission from aluminum after low energy protons impact

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2023.165170

Keywords

Secondary electron emission; Electron backscattering; Monte Carlo simulation; Double differential cross section; Angular and energy distributions; Electron emission yield

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study develops a Monte Carlo simulation approach to describe proton-induced secondary electron emission in solids. Theoretical modeling based on the Mott's elastic scattering cross-section and Lindhard's dielectric function was used to calculate the double differential cross-section (DDCS) of excited electrons and describe electron transport in the medium. The results for aluminum show the angular and energy distributions of backscattered electrons for incident protons with energy below 25 keV at normal incidence, and the total electron emission yield also agrees well with available measurements.
A Monte Carlo (MC) simulation approach is developed to describe the proton-induced secondary electron emission in solids. First, we calculate the double differential cross-section (DDCS) of excited electrons for different charge fractions of the projectile resulting from electron screening. The DDCS parameter is used in MC calculations to describe electron transport in the medium. This parameter is calculated for electrons excited in the 1 eV -100 eV energy range. The theoretical electron transport modeling is based on Mott's elastic scattering cross-section and Lindhard's dielectric function for inelastic scattering. The results obtained for aluminum describe the angular and energy distributions of backscattered electrons for incident protons with energy below 25 keV at normal incidence. Additionally, the total electron emission yield is also calculated, showing a good agreement with available measurements. Our predictions for energy and angular distributions could not be compared with experimental results due to a lack of data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available