4.7 Article

Thermo-mechanical characteristics of oxide-coated aluminum nano-powder

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES
Volume 197, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2023.108767

Keywords

Oxide-coated Al nano-powder; Hydrostatic compression test; Thermal conductivity; Reactive force field (ReaxFF); Reversed non-equilibrium molecular dynamics; (rNEMD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a comprehensive study on the thermo-mechanical characteristics of oxide-coated aluminum nano-powder. It is found that the thermal conductivity of oxide-coated aluminum nano-powder is significantly lower than that of the bulk aluminum, and it is affected by the density and temperature.
This paper presents a comprehensive study on the thermo-mechanical characteristics of oxide-coated aluminum nano-powder, which is a crucial property for their application in powder metallurgy, particularly in warm compaction process. A representative volume element (RVE) of oxide-coated aluminum nano-powder is analyzed under the hydrostatic compression test at different temperatures using the Reactive Molecular Dynamics (RMD) method that can predict the thermal conductivity of nano-powders by incorporating the interaction effects of density and temperature. The thermal conductivity is evaluated based on the Muller-Plathe's reverse non-equilibrium molecular dynamics (rNEMD) method, and the size dependence of the method is investigated. The computational model is validated with the experimental data. The results illustrate that the thermal con-ductivity of oxide-coated aluminum nano-powder is significantly lower than that of the bulk aluminum due to restricted surface contact between individual aluminum particles. Moreover, it is observed that increasing the density and temperature leads to an increase in the thermal conductivity of oxide-coated aluminum nano-powder.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available