3.8 Article

Intrawound navigation for custom-made acetabular component in revision total hip arthroplasty: Does it improve implant positioning?

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS
Volume 48, Issue -, Pages 6-12

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.11.032

Keywords

Custom-made acetabular implants; Hip joint; Revision total hip arthroplasty; Standard acetabular implants; Three-dimensional imaging

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to develop a reliable and easily reproducible method for positioning custom-made acetabular components (CMAC) in hip revision surgery. The use of intraoperative navigation significantly improves the accuracy of implant positioning and reduces the risk of malpositioning. Navigation allows for better planning of implant and reamer sizes, providing optimal bone preparation and preservation in cases of massive bone defects.
Background: The number of hip revisions makes up over 12 % of all hip arthroplasty cases. For large acetabular defects custom-made acetabular component (CMAC) are required. Rates of malposition of CMACs are highly variable. Our study aims to develop a readily available, reliable and easily reproducible method for positioning of the CMAC. We tried to answer the following questions: 1) how often does the postoperative position of the implant corresponds to the planned one; 2) is the use of intrawound navigation improve the precision of acetabular implant position.Methods: This was a single-center observational cohort study and included two groups: the experimental group (use of 3D navigation for implant positioning) and the control group (no navigation use). All the patients were scheduled for acetabular revision surgery with custom-made 3D-printed acetabular components. All surgeries took place between 2016 and 2020.Results: 25 % freehand group, 85 % implants in the navigation group matched accuracy positioning criteria. The relative risk of malposition was significantly higher without the intraoperative navigation, with 5 times greater risk of malpositioning in the freehand group versus the navigation group.Conclusion: Navigation method allows planning of the implant and reamer sizes for optimal bone preparation and preservation. It provides easier implantation of the complex implant with reliable, stable primary fixation in massive bone defects. It reliably decreases malposition rate, allowing for implant placement in a proper position with sufficient bone-implant contact. Further research is needed to determine the relationship between CMAC position accuracy and long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available