AGREEMENT BETWEEN SINGLE RATERS AND TEAM RATING WHEN APPLYING THE INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH'S REHABILITATION SET

Objective: To quantify the agreement between functional assessments by a single rater and a team using the Chinese version of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Rehabilitation Set in a clinical situation.Design: Inter-rater, multicentre agreement study.Subjects: A total of 193 adult inpatients admitted to 5 rehabilitation centres at 5 hospitals in ChinaMethods: The Chinese version of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Rehabilitation Set was used by either a single rater or a team to assess 193 patients at 5 Chinese hospitals. Percentage of agreement and quadratic-weighted kappa coefficients were computed. Evaluation times were compared with paired t-tests.Results: The mean team and individual evaluation times were not significantly different. The percen-tage of agreement ranged from 46.1% to 94.2% depending on the item, and the quadratic-weighted kappas ranged from 0.43 to 0.92. Eight categories (26.6%) showed a weighted kappa exceeding 0.4, 11 others (36.7%) exceeded 0.6, and another 11 (36.7%) produced kappas of more than 0.8.Conclusion: Either a single rater or a team of raters can produce valid and consistent ratings when using the Chinese version of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Rehabilitation Set to assess patients in a rehabilitation department. The team rating approach is suitable for clinical application.

Automated summary

This study aimed to assess the agreement between a single rater and a team using the Chinese version of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Rehabilitation Set. The results showed that both a single rater and a team produced valid and consistent ratings when assessing patients in a rehabilitation department. The team rating approach can be suitable for clinical application.