4.4 Article

Picea pungens exhibits greatest tolerance to short-time thermal stress compared to Picea abies, and Picea omorika

Journal

NEW FORESTS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11056-023-10002-0

Keywords

Picea pungens; Picea abies; Picea omorika; Heat resistance; Needle water content; Fv/Fm; Maximal photochemical efficiency

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that Picea pungens exhibited the highest thermal tolerance, followed by Picea omorika and Picea abies, indicating the potential for selecting species based on their thermal tolerance in reforestation efforts in the face of climate change.
Species in the genus Picea are well-suited for afforestation on high altitudes and latitudes, but are fairly intolerant to high temperatures. In this study, Picea pungens, Picea abies, and Picea omorika were subjected to 45 degrees C, 40 degrees C, 35 degrees C, and ambient temperature (CK) for 6 h, and then allowed to recover for 28 d. Changes in phenotype, relative water content (RWC), and maximal photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) of photosystem II (PS II) were observed to ascertain their thermal tolerance. Overall, all three species were negatively affected by exposure to 45 degrees C, but P. pungens exhibited full recovery, with the highest RWC, while P. omorika exhibited partial recovery, and P. abies showed minimal recovery. The PS II of all three species were damaged after 45 degrees C treatment, but that of P. pungens exhibited the most dramatic recovery, with Fv/Fm recovering from 0 to 0.26. In conclusion, P. pungens was found to exhibit the greatest thermal tolerance, followed by P. omorika and P. abies. Thus, thermal tolerance should be considered as a tool for species selection for future reforestation endeavor in the face of climate change that is expected to bring high summer temperature events.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available