4.7 Review

Comparative assessment of chemical and biochemical approaches for the activation of lignocellulosic materials and emerging opportunities for expansin-related proteins

Journal

CELLULOSE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-023-05637-3

Keywords

Expansins; Pre-treatment; Lignocellulose; Activation; Enzymes; Fibers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cellulose activation plays a crucial role in various industrial processes, and expansin-related proteins have the potential to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic substrates for biofuel production. This review compares conventional and emerging technologies for cellulose activation and evaluates the potential of expansin-related proteins, while also presenting future applications.
Cellulose activation is a necessary step in many industrial processes including production of cellulose derivatives, regenerated cellulose, biofuels and biochemicals. Expansins and expansin-related proteins have been shown to disrupt the fibrillar aggregation and loosen the structure of lignocellulosic materials but typically lack lytic activity. Therefore, they offer a new but rather unexploited possibility for biomass to obtain better accessibility and reactivity. From an applied perspective, expansin-related proteins have been investigated for their potential to promote enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic substrates for the purpose of producing biofuels. The aim of this review is to compare conventional and emerging technologies relevant to cellulose activation, and critically evaluate the potential of expansin-related proteins for this purpose. As part of this assessment, methods to evaluate the action of expansin-related proteins on cellulosic substrates are summarized, and reported impacts are discussed in relation to source of the cellulosic substrate and treatment conditions. An outlook on prospective applications of expansin-related proteins is presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available