3.8 Article

The Earl of Manchester and opera in London

Journal

EARLY MUSIC
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/em/caad036

Keywords

Charles Montagu; Earl (later Duke) of Manchester); opera; Nicolini; John Vanbrugh; London; Venice; George Frideric Handel; Marco Ricci; Giovanni Pellegrini

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Charles Montagu played a crucial role in the establishment of Italian-style opera in London. His travels and diplomatic missions provided him with knowledge about opera and continental singers and musicians. His correspondence sheds light on his involvement in opera in London, Vienna, France, and Italy and highlights the interconnectedness of opera across Europe.
Charles Montagu (c.1662-1722), Earl (later Duke) of Manchester, played an important role in furthering the establishment of Italian-style opera in London. He gained knowledge of opera and continental singers and musicians on his Grand Tour and three diplomatic missions abroad. This article prints relevant portions (some for the first time) from his correspondence and other printed and manuscript sources to expand our knowledge of his involvement with opera in London, Vienna, France and Italy. The correspondence suggests why his advice and assistance were sought by John Vanbrugh and later by the Royal Academy of Music and adds to our knowledge of the history of opera in London in its so-called 'critical decade'. Most important was his mission to Venice in 1707-8. Although no evidence has emerged that Manchester met Handel in Venice or extended to him an invitation, he was responsible for the recruitment of Nicola Grimaldi (called 'Nicolini'), painters and other singers to London. Even at this early stage, opera in London was part of an operatic system that extended across Europe, involving not only musicians and impresarios but also ministers of state and foreign diplomats.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available