4.7 Article

High-sensitivity Beamformed Observations of the Crab Pulsar's Radio Emission

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 959, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/acfa6f

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed European VLBI Network data of the Crab Pulsar at 1658.49 MHz and investigated the rates, fluence, phase, and arrival time distributions. The analysis revealed that giant pulses represent about 80% of the total flux and the likelihood of finding another giant pulse is influenced by the time interval between bursts.
We analyzed four epochs of beamformed European VLBI Network data of the Crab Pulsar at 1658.49 MHz. With the high sensitivity resulting from resolving out the Crab Nebula, we are able to detect even the faint high-frequency components in the folded profile. We also detect a total of 65,951 giant pulses, which we use to investigate the rates, fluence, phase, and arrival time distributions. We find that for the main pulse component, our giant pulses represent about 80% of the total flux. This suggests we have a nearly complete giant pulse energy distribution, although it is not obvious how the observed distribution could be extended to cover the remaining 20% of the flux without invoking large numbers of faint bursts for every rotation. Looking at the difference in arrival time between subsequent bursts in single rotations, we confirm that the likelihood of finding giant pulses close to each other is increased beyond that expected for randomly occurring bursts-some giant pulses consist of causally related microbursts, with typical separations of similar to 30 mu s-but also find evidence that at separations greater than or similar to 100 mu s the likelihood of finding another giant pulse is suppressed. In addition, our high sensitivity enabled us to detect weak echo features in the brightest pulses (at similar to 0.4% of the peak giant pulse flux), which are delayed by up to similar to 300 mu s.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available