4.7 Article

Reputation incentives with public supervision promote cooperation in evolutionary games

Journal

APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION
Volume 466, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2023.128445

Keywords

Evolutionary game; Public supervision; Reputation incentive mechanism; Evaluation; Prisoner's dilemma game

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Public supervision plays an important role in guiding and influencing individual behavior. This study proposes a reputation incentives mechanism with public supervision, where each player has the authority to evaluate others. Numerical simulations show that reputation provides positive incentives for cooperation.
Public supervision, as a source of social behavioral norms and moral guidelines, exerts important guidance and influence on individuals. To maintain public order, in this study, we propose a reputation incentives mechanism with public supervision, in which each player is granted the authority to evaluate others. These players, by observing, can make positive or negative evaluations that derive from the satisfaction level of the interactive behavior to neighbors choosing cooperation or defection in each round of the evolutionary game. Evaluations made by defectors are considered untrustworthy, resulting in the evaluation values assigned to others being halved. After mutual evaluation, the reputation is an average of the evaluations given by all their neighbors and then is consequently granted to each player. The results of numerical simulations demonstrate that reputation provides rewards that positively incentivize cooperation. And we observe that a weaker evaluation intensity leads to more stable and higher levels of cooperation among individuals. This mechanism provides valuable insights into the evolution of reputation and the optimization of supervising mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available