4.7 Article

Effects of the Toxic Non-Protein Amino Acid β-Methylamino-L-Alanine (BMAA) on Intracellular Amino Acid Levels in Neuroblastoma Cells

Journal

TOXINS
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxins15110647

Keywords

beta-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA); L-serine; amino acid; motor neuron disease; amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cyanobacterial neurotoxin BMAA had a profound effect on intracellular amino acid levels in human neuroblastoma cells at specific time points, but homeostasis was restored in most cases. Supplementation with L-serine protected against BMAA toxicity. Amino acids potentially involved in protection against BMAA-induced oxidation were depleted in cells at later time points.
The cyanobacterial non-protein amino acid (AA) beta-Methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA) is considered to be a neurotoxin. BMAA caused histopathological changes in brains and spinal cords of primates consistent with some of those seen in early motor neuron disease; however, supplementation with L-serine protected against some of those changes. We examined the impact of BMAA on AA concentrations in human neuroblastoma cells in vitro. Cells were treated with 1000 mu M BMAA and intracellular free AA concentrations in treated and control cells were compared at six time-points over a 48 h culture period. BMAA had a profound effect on intracellular AA levels at specific time points but in most cases, AA homeostasis was re-established in the cell. The most heavily impacted amino acid was serine which was depleted in BMAA-treated cells from 9 h onwards. Correction of serine depletion could be a factor in the observation that supplementation with L-serine protects against BMAA toxicity in vitro and in vivo. AAs that could potentially be involved in protection against BMAA-induced oxidation such as histidine, tyrosine, and phenylalanine were depleted in cells at later time points.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available