4.3 Article

Quality in special education from teacher perspectives

Journal

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08856257.2023.2294239

Keywords

Quality in special education; separate special education schools; teacher perspective

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to identify quality indicators in separate special education schools, based on the perspectives of teachers. Six main themes were identified, including teacher and administrator qualifications, school environment, curriculum and educational process, family interest and attitude, policies and practices, and child-related factors. Various factors such as qualified teachers, materials, social perspective, evidence-based practices, family support, and individualized education programs were found to play important roles as quality indicators in separate special education schools.
In this study, we aimed to determine the quality indicators in separate special education schools that only educate individuals with special needs from the perspectives of teachers. We collected data from 82 special education teachers included by maximum diversity sampling using a semi-structured interview form. We conducted a content analysis using the MAXQDA qualitative data analysis program. As a result of the study, we identified six main themes as quality indicators in separate special education schools. These were teacher and administrator qualifications, school environment (social and physical), curriculum and educational process, family interest and attitude, policies and practices, and child-related factors. Moreover, several factors such as teachers with degrees in special education, materials, social perspective, evidence-based practices, family support, and individualised education programs were found to play an important role as quality indicators in separate special education schools. Improvements in quality indicators in separate special education schools can contribute to student outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available