Journal
APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 355, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122210
Keywords
Lithium -ion battery; State of charge; Battery ultrasonic response model; Adaptive extend Kalman filter; Adaptive H -infinity filter
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study proposes an ultrasonic model-based method for battery state of charge (SoC) estimation, which shows high accuracy and robustness under dynamic load profiles. Experimental results demonstrate that the ultrasonic model accurately estimates the SoC of the battery compared to the traditional voltage model.
Accurate estimation of the State of Charge (SoC) plays a vital role in ensuring the efficient and safe operation of lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries. However, the flat open circuit voltage (OCV) curve of the LFP battery implies a low sensitivity to SoC, which results in large SoC estimation errors in the presence of noisy terminal voltage measurements. To address this challenge, an SoC estimation methodology utilizing an ultrasonic reflection response model is proposed, which is the first methodology regarding highly accurate and robust ultrasonic model-based SoC estimation under dynamic load profiles. Since ultrasound waves enable nondestructive acquisition of battery internal physical property changes directly associated with SoC, the ultrasonic battery near-surface reflection feature is extracted and demonstrated to exhibit a highly linear correlation with and higher sensitivity to SoC. We pioneeringly construct an empirical differential ultrasonic model to describe how the ultrasonic feature depends on the SoC and dynamic current. The advantage of such an ultrasonic model is demonstrated by theoretical and experimental results of an Adaptive Extend Kalman Filter (AEKF) and an Adaptive H-infinity Filter (AHIF) under various dynamic load profiles and temperatures. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) for ultrasonic model-based SoC estimation remains at approximately 1% across all tests, reducing by 36.7% compared to the voltage model, which shows its great potential in accurate SoC estimation.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available