3.8 Article

Exploring Psilocybe spp. mycelium and fruiting body chemistry for potential therapeutic compounds

Journal

FRONTIERS IN FUNGAL BIOLOGY
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/ffunb.2023.1295223

Keywords

metabolomics; Psilocybe; mycelia; multivariate analysis; culture methods; PCA; fruiting body; magic mushrooms

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used metabolomics analysis to identify the chemical composition differences among different growth stages of Psilocybe mushrooms. The accumulation of specific compounds in fruiting bodies differentiated them from mycelia. Studying the compounds found in Psilocybe mycelia as potential therapeutic targets could be significant.
Psilocybe mushrooms, otherwise known as magic mushrooms, owe their psychedelic effect to psilocin, a serotonin subtype 2A (5-HT2A) receptor agonist and metabolite of psilocybin, the primary indole alkaloid found in Psilocybe species. Metabolomics is an advanced fingerprinting tool that can be utilized to identify the differences among fungal life stages that may otherwise be unaccounted for. In this study, by using targeted and untargeted (metabolomic) multivariate analysis, we demonstrate that the chemical composition of Psilocybe differs among mycelia, grain mycelia, and fruiting bodies. The preferential accumulation of psilocybin, baeocystin, tryptophan, ergothioneine, and phenylethylamine in fruiting bodies differentiated them from mycelia; however, the levels of alpha-glycerylphosphorylcholine (alpha-GPC), N-acetylglucosamine, and trimethylglycine were found to be proportionally higher in mycelia than in fruiting bodies based on Pareto-scaled data. Considering the wealth of compounds with therapeutic potential that have been isolated from various fungal genera, it would be pertinent to study the compounds found in Psilocybe mycelia as potential naturally derived therapeutic targets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available