4.3 Article

Wang Shu's promenade of strolling in shan-shui and its dialogue with Le Corbusier's concept

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13467581.2023.2287713

Keywords

Promenade; Le Corbusier; Wang shu's architecture; picturesque space; spatial movement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper examines the promenade concepts of Wang Shu and Le Corbusier, highlighting their similarities and showcasing the fusion of Eastern and Western architecture in contemporary discourse.
The architectural promenade, developed by Le Corbusier, is also a significant design concept in the contemporary architectural works of Wang Shu. This paper focused on Wang Shu's and Le Corbusier's promenade concepts aiming to illustrate how Wang's promenade of strolling in Shan-shui establishes a cross-cultural dialogue with Le Corbusier's theory. These two promenade approaches appear to have emerged from distinct historical and cultural contexts, with Le Corbusier's approach rooted in Western modernism and Wang's approach reflecting the aesthetics of traditional Chinese landscape painting. Seemingly unrelated, a thorough case analysis of Le Corbusier's Villa La Roche and Wang's Ningbo Tengtou Pavilion unveiled commonalities in creating picturesque spaces and spatial movement. Furthermore, both promenade approaches trigger discussions on architecture. Whereas Le Corbusier's architectural promenade facilitated the creation of new architecture, Wang was inspired by Le Corbusier's way of thinking, but aimed to rebuild a kind of Chinese vernacular architecture in response to the status quo of China's urban architectural development. Wang Shu's promenade opens a spectrum between traditional landscape painting and Le Corbusier's ideas, showcasing a fusion of influences and inspirations from diverse cultural contexts, while also contributing to an understanding of the integration of Eastern and Western architecture in contemporary discourse.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available