Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Controversy and Debate: Questionable utility of the relative risk in clinical research: Paper 2: Is the Odds Ratio portable in meta-analysis? Time to consider bivariate generalized linear mixed model COMMENT
Mengli Xiao et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2022)
Interpreting logit models
Luca J. Uberti
STATA JOURNAL (2022)
The Partial Derivative Framework for Substantive Regression Effects
Dale S. Kim et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS (2022)
Noncollapsibility, confounding, and sparse-data bias. Part 1: The oddities of odds COMMENT
Sander Greenland
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)
Noncollapsibility, confounding, and sparse-data bias. Part 2: What should researchers make of persistent controversies about the odds ratio?
Sander Greenland
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)
Using Predictions and Marginal Effects to Compare Groups in Regression Models for Binary Outcomes
J. Scott Long et al.
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH (2021)
On Group Comparisons With Logistic Regression Models
Jouni Kuha et al.
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH (2020)
A review of the application of logistic regression in educational research: common issues, implications, and suggestions
Lian Niu
EDUCATIONAL REVIEW (2020)
Log Odds and the Interpretation of Logit Models
Edward C. Norton et al.
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH (2018)
Odds Ratios-Current Best Practice and Use
Edward C. Norton et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2018)
The alarming problems of confounding equivalence using logistic regression models in the perspective of causal diagrams
Yuanyuan Yu et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2017)
Compression and Conditional Effects: A Product Term Is Essential When Using Logistic Regression to Test for Interaction
Carlisle Rainey
POLITICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH AND METHODS (2016)
A Primer on Marginal Effects-Part II: Health Services Research Applications
E. Onukwugha et al.
PHARMACOECONOMICS (2015)
Estimating predicted probabilities from logistic regression: different methods correspond to different target populations
Clemma J. Muller et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2014)
Behind the Curve: Clarifying the Best Approach to Calculating Predicted Probabilities and Marginal Effects from Limited Dependent Variable Models
Michael J. Hanmer et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE (2013)
Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects
Richard Williams
STATA JOURNAL (2012)
Logistic Regression: Why We Cannot Do What We Think We Can Do, and What We Can Do About It
Carina Mood
EUROPEAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW (2010)
Robustness of Logit analysis: Unobserved heterogeneity and mis-specified disturbances
J. S. Cramer
OXFORD BULLETIN OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS (2007)
Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses
T Brambor et al.
POLITICAL ANALYSIS (2006)