4.3 Article

Computational complexity of jumping block puzzles

Journal

THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE
Volume 983, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcs.2023.114292

Keywords

Combinatorial reconfiguration; Computational complexity; Jumping block puzzle; Sliding block puzzle; Token jumping

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sliding block puzzles play a crucial role in computational complexity, with their complexity varying depending on the rules and set of pieces. In this study, we explore the computational complexities of jumping block puzzles, a newer concept in the puzzle community. We analyze different variants of these puzzles based on real puzzles and a natural model, and determine their complexities. Our findings show that these puzzles are generally PSPACE-complete, with additional cases being NP-complete or solvable in polynomial-time.
In the context of computational complexity of puzzles, the sliding block puzzles play an important role. Depending on the rules and set of pieces, the sliding block puzzles can be polynomial-time solvable, NP-complete, or PSPACE-complete. On the other hand, a relatively new notion of jumping block puzzles has been proposed in the puzzle community. This is a counterpart to the token jumping model of the combinatorial reconfiguration problems in the context of block puzzles. We investigate some variants of jumping block puzzles, which are based on actual puzzles, and a natural model from the viewpoint of combinatorial reconfiguration, and determine their computational complexities. More precisely, we investigate two generalizations of two actual puzzles which are called Flip Over puzzles and Flying Block puzzles and one natural model of jumping block puzzles from the viewpoint of combinatorial reconfiguration. We prove that they are PSPACE-complete in general. We also prove the NP-completeness of these puzzles in some restricted cases, and we give polynomial-time algorithms for some restricted cases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available