4.6 Article

Familiarity of teaching skills among general practitioners transfer training trainers in China: a cross-sectional survey

Journal

BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04945-3

Keywords

General practice; Primary care; Teaching skill; Familiarity; Trainer; Transfer training

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study identified gaps in the teaching skills of GP transfer training trainers in China, indicating the need for targeted training programs to enhance their teaching competencies.
BackgroundThe insufficient number of general practitioners (GPs) is a major challenge facing China's healthcare system. The purpose of the GP transfer training programme was to provide training for experienced doctors to transition to general practice. However, research on the competencies of GP transfer training trainers in teaching skills in China is limited. This cross-sectional study aimed to examine the baseline familiarity with teaching skills among Chinese GP transfer training trainers.MethodsAn online survey was conducted among trainers who participated in the 2021 Sichuan Province General Practice Training Trainer Program. The survey collected data on participants' characteristics and familiarity with 20 skills in three essential teaching knowledge areas: the core functions of primary care (five questions), preparation for lesson plan (four questions), and teaching methods (11 questions).ResultsIn total, 305 participants completed the survey. Familiarity rates were generally low across all three essential teaching knowledge areas. No significant differences were observed in familiarity rates between the tertiary and secondary hospitals.ConclusionThis study revealed gaps in the teaching skills of GP transfer training trainers in China. These results suggest the necessity for targeted training programs to enhance the teaching skills and competencies of trainers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available