Bureaucratic professionalization and cabinet management: How civil servants in presidential democracies are treated differently

How does bureaucratic structure shape presidential strategy in managing top executive posts? The comparative literature on cabinet formation focuses heavily on presidential legislative strategy, largely overlooking the administrative dimension of cabinet management. This article fills this gap by examining how bureaucratic professionalization shapes the president's strategy in distributing and managing cabinet posts. We argue that as bureaucracies become more autonomous via professionalization, ministers from the bureaucracy are more likely to be central players in presidential cabinet management. Our analysis of original data on 1538 ministers' cabinet careers from 26 presidential administrations in four Asian democracies shows that bureaucrats are more likely to receive and retain cabinet posts in key policy areas as bureaucratic professionalization increases, whereas they are less likely to do so with decreasing bureaucratic professionalization. This finding suggests that presidential cabinet management follows a different set of rules according to the level of bureaucratic professionalization.

Automated summary

This article examines how bureaucratic professionalization affects the president's strategy in managing cabinet posts and finds that the level of bureaucratic professionalization has an impact on the likelihood of bureaucrats receiving and retaining cabinet posts. It suggests that presidential cabinet management follows different rules according to the level of bureaucratic professionalization.