4.2 Article

FISH analysis reveals CDKN2A and IFNA14 co-deletion is heterogeneous and is a prominent feature of glioblastoma

Journal

BRAIN TUMOR PATHOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s10014-023-00473-6

Keywords

Glioblastoma; FISH; CDKN2A; Interferon-alpha (IFNA); IHC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Deletion of CDKN2A and IFNA14 genes on chromosome 9 in glioblastomas may occur simultaneously, and their co-deletion is negatively correlated with patient survival. The intact status of CDKN2A/IFNA14 is associated with longer survival and second surgery, indicating improved patient outcomes.
Deletion of CDKN2A occurs in 50% of glioblastomas (GBM), and IFNA locus deletion in 25%. These genes reside closely on chromosome 9. We investigated whether CDKN2A and IFNA were co-deleted within the same heterogeneous tumour and their prognostic implications. We assessed CDKN2A and IFNA14 deletions in 45 glioma samples using an in-house three-colour FISH probe. We examined the correlation between p16(INK4a) protein expression (via IHC) and CDKN2A deletion along with the impact of these genomic events on patient survival. FISH analyses demonstrated that grades II and III had either wildtype (wt) or amplified CDKN2A/IFNA14, whilst 44% of GBMs harboured homozygous deletions of both genes. Cores with CDKN2A homozygous deletion (n = 11) were negative for p16(INK4a). Twenty p16(INK4a) positive samples lacked CDKN2A deletion with some of cells showing negative p16(INK4a). There was heterogeneity in IFNA14/CDKN2A ploidy within each GBM. Survival analyses of primary GBMs suggested a positive association between increased p16(INK4a) and longer survival; this persisted when considering CDKN2A/IFNA14 status. Furthermore, wt (intact) CDKN2A/IFNA14 were found to be associated with longer survival in recurrent GBMs. Our data suggest that co-deletion of CDKN2A/IFNA14 in GBM negatively correlates with survival and CDKN2A-wt status correlated with longer survival, and with second surgery, itself a marker for improved patient outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available