4.5 Article

Urban and rural healthcare providers' perspectives on HPV vaccination in Minnesota

Journal

HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2291859

Keywords

HPV; human papillomavirus; rural health; rural health services; vaccine hesitancy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

HPV vaccination coverage is lower in rural areas compared to urban areas, and overall HPV vaccination coverage in the United States is lower than other adolescent vaccines. Unique factors in rural communities, such as values, misinformation, and close patient-provider relationships, need to be considered in interventions to increase HPV vaccination.
Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination can dramatically reduce the incidence of HPV-associated cancers. However, HPV vaccination coverage in rural areas is lower than in urban areas, and overall HPV vaccination coverage in the United States remains lower than other adolescent vaccines. We conducted 20 qualitative interviews with adolescent healthcare providers and clinic staff in urban and rural Minnesota and assessed their perspectives on HPV vaccination. Guiding interview topics included: strategies to persuade families to vaccinate their children, the impact of the patient-provider relationship and the clinical environment on vaccination uptake, and provider perceptions of parents' vaccine attitudes. In thematic analysis, all participants reported using common vaccination strategies, such as framing the HPV vaccine in terms of cancer prevention. The analysis also revealed three themes described as occurring uniquely or more intensely in rural communities than urban communities: the rural value of choice or independence, the spread of misinformation, and close-knit, multifaceted patient-provider relationships in clinical practice. Interventions aimed at increasing HPV vaccination should consider the distinctive circumstances of rural healthcare providers and patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available