4.6 Article

Establishment and Validation of a Model for Fetal Neural Ischemia Using Necrotic Core-Free Human Spinal Cord Organoids

Journal

STEM CELLS TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/stcltm/szad089

Keywords

ischemia; spinal cord organoids; drug screening; hypoxia; necrotic core

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fetal spinal cord ischemia is a serious condition with limited understanding and treatment options. We established a screening system using spinal cord organoids and discovered the mild neuroprotective effects of rapamycin.
Fetal spinal cord ischemia is a serious medical condition that can result in significant neurological damage and adverse outcomes for the fetus. However, the lack of an appropriate experimental model has hindered the understanding of the pathology and the development of effective treatments. In our study, we established a system for screening drugs that affect fetal spinal cord ischemia using spinal cord organoids. Importantly, we produced necrotic core-free human spinal cord organoids (nf-hSCOs) by reducing the organoid size to avoid potential complications of spontaneous necrosis in large organoids. Exposing nf-hSCOs to CoCl2 as a hypoxia mimetic and hypoglycemic conditions resulted in significant neuronal damage, as assessed by multiple assay batteries. By utilizing this model, we tested chemicals that have been reported to exhibit beneficial effects in brain organoid-based ischemia models. Surprisingly, these chemicals did not provide sufficient benefit, and we discovered that rapamycin is a mild neuroprotective reagent for both axon degeneration and neuronal survival. We propose that nf-hSCO is suitable for large-scale screening of fetal neural ischemia due to its scalability, ease of ischemic induction, implementation of quantifiable assay batteries, and the absence of spontaneous necrosis. Graphical Abstract

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available