3.8 Article

At home and abroad: Comparing sustainable behaviour and willingness to pay across contexts

Journal

TOURISM AND HOSPITALITY RESEARCH
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/14673584231221967

Keywords

Sustainability; frugality; altruism; pro-sustainable behavior; propensity to pay

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study finds that a person's everyday behavior at home does influence their sustainable travel behavior and propensity to pay. Those who are more altruistic and environmentally minded are more likely to engage in sustainable travel and seek local experiences, while those who are more frugal are less likely to engage in sustainable travel.
Does a person's everyday behavior at home influence their desire to travel sustainably and pay for it? Testing the Holmes, Dodds and Frochot (HDF) model, this research sought to understand the influence that daily behavior - measured by frugality, altruism, and pro-environmental behavior - has on both sustainable travel behavior and a traveler's propensity to pay. This paper augments the HDF model in that it finds sustainable travel behavior to be not just a single construct, but rather influenced separately by sociocultural, environmental and local consumption behaviors. Second, this study also examines how these differences in sustainable travel influence the traveler's propensity to pay. The findings of this study explain that day-to-day behavior at home does explain a traveler's propensity to pay for sustainability efforts when traveling. Those who are more altruistic are more likely to be more environmentally friendly and more likely to look for local experiences when traveling. Those who are more environmentally minded at home are also more likely to seek out cultural, environmentally friendly and local experiences when traveling. In contrast, those who are more frugal are less likely to be environmentally friendly when traveling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available