3.8 Article

The ill-fated triad: Roosevelt, Stalin and Churchill - Post-Yalta strokes and the impact on world leaders

Journal

Publisher

TEHRAN UNIV MEDICAL SCIENCES PUBL

Keywords

Franklin D; Roosevelt; Joseph Stalin; Winston Churchill; stroke

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This manuscript examines the health status of Franklin D. Roosevelt, Joseph Stalin, and Winston Churchill during and after the Yalta Conference, exploring the factors contributing to their strokes and the impact of their declining health on their countries and the world. The secrecy surrounding their health conditions and the importance of understanding the health of political leaders are also highlighted.
The Yalta Conference of 1945 brought together three of the most influential leaders of the 20th century: Franklin D. Roosevelt, Joseph Stalin and Winston Churchill. Surprisingly, all three leaders would go on to suffer strokes after the conference. This manuscript examines the health status of these leaders during and after the Yalta Conference, the factors that contributed to their strokes (including the role of hypertension), and other modifiable risk factors present in each one of them, and the impact of their declining health on their countries and the world. Roosevelt's demise, prior to the conclusion of the war, triggered a leadership transition during a critical moment in history, while Churchill and Stalin's passing shaped the early Cold War era. A veil of secrecy shrouded the health conditions of these pivotal leaders. The Big Three made considerable efforts to hide their health conditions from both the press and the public at large. Understanding the health of political leaders is crucial as it can affect their decision-making abilities and the course of history. The fates of Roosevelt, Stalin and Churchill serve as important reminders of the potential consequences of poor health in the highest echelons of political power.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available