4.7 Article

Micro-scale mechanism for cyclic deformation behavior in zirconium under low-cycle-fatigue loading

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE
Volume 179, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.108065

Keywords

Low-cycle fatigue; Deformation mechanism; Dislocation; Microstructure evolution; Zirconium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cyclic deformation behaviors and damage mechanisms of pure Zr were investigated. The cyclic stress response was mainly influenced by substructure evolutions. Prismatic < a > dislocation slip was identified as the dominant deformation mechanism. Fatigue damage was not only influenced by the initial texture, but also other factors.
Cyclic deformation behaviors and damage mechanisms of pure Zr were systemically investigated at fully reversed strain-controlled tension-compression fatigue experiments (R = - 1), followed by detailed microstructural characterization using scanning electron microscopy with electron backscatter diffraction and transmission electron microscopy. The results demonstrated that three stages (I, II, III) of cyclic response behavior were observed for all applied strain amplitudes, and the trend of the cyclic stress response mainly originated from the substructure evolutions. The initial cyclic softening was attributed to the formation of alternating high- and lowdislocation-density regions, enhancing the free path of dislocation motion. The fatigue life prediction model was established based on the hysteresis loops strain energy. SEM/EBSD slip traces analysis and TEM double beam diffraction analysis showed that prismatic < a > dislocation slip was the dominating deformation mechanism, and pyramidal < c + a > dislocations and {1012} twins played an essential role in accommodating plastic deformations. Further, fatigue damage behavior was not only influenced by initial texture, but also other factors played an essential role.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available