4.7 Article

Sectional strength design of a double-skin truss-reinforced composite shear wall

Journal

THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES
Volume 195, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2023.111377

Keywords

Double -skin composite shear wall; Truss connector; Shear strength; Flexural Strength; Design Proposal

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces the composition and advantages of the double-skin truss-reinforced composite shear wall, and establishes the design formulas for shear strength and flexure strength based on experimental analysis, providing guidance for the design of double-skin truss-reinforced composite shear walls.
The double-skin truss-reinforced composite shear wall is an innovative element which comprises two steel plates, core concrete, concrete-filled steel tubes (CFSTs), which act as boundary members, and steel truss connectors. Truss connectors decrease the out-of-plane deformation that affects the steel plates, and due to the resultant connection and constraint effects, the truss connectors enhance the bearing capacity of the wall. This paper briefly introduces the quasi-static test of five full-scale rectangular double-skin truss-reinforced composite shear wall specimens. The specimen exhibited shear compression failure with an aspect ratio of 2.0, and flexure shear failure occurred when the aspect ratio exceeded 2.0. Based on the analysis of actual stress state of the steel web and actual working performance of the infilled concrete, the shear strength and flexure strength design formulas of double-skin truss-reinforced composite shear wall were established. Comparison results with 26 specimens demonstrate that the design formulas exhibit remarkable accuracy, as most errors are within 20 % and 25 %, respectively. Which provide a preliminary sectional strength design proposal for the double-skin truss-reinforced composite shear wall.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available