4.1 Article

Losing Passion: A Test of the Seasonal Attenuation of Passion (SAP) Hypothesis Across Three Longitudinal Studies With Athletes and Sport Fans

Journal

Publisher

EDUCATIONAL PUBLISHING FOUNDATION-AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/spy0000339

Keywords

dualistic model of passion; harmonious passion; latent change score modeling; latent growth modeling; obsessive passion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the changes in passion for sport over the course of a season. The findings suggest that the levels of passion decline over time, which has implications for our understanding of how passion changes over time in sporting activities.
People often feel passionate toward activities in sport. But passion can change, and we know very little about how or when passion for sport changes over time. Here, we present a hypothesis about how, when, and why passion changes over time-the seasonal attenuation of passion hypothesis-which predicts that levels of passion toward activities will tend to decline over the course of a season in sport. We tested this hypothesis in three studies with intercollegiate volleyball players (N = 421), intercollegiate athletes from various sports (N = 298), and fans of the Winnipeg Jets (N = 418). In each study, participants reported levels of passion (i.e., harmonious passion, obsessive passion, general passion) at either the start and end of a season (Study 1) or at the start, middle, and end of a season (Studies 2 and 3). Using latent change score modeling (Study 1) and latent growth modeling (Studies 2 and 3), we found that all scores of passion decreased over the course of each season. This has implications for our understanding of how passion changes over time, especially in sporting activities which are often organized in recurring seasons; there appears to be a tendency for a season to sap people's passion over time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available