4.1 Article

'Adoption is Kinda Hard and Kinda Cool': Residential care children's views on adoption and preparation for adoption

Journal

CHILD & FAMILY SOCIAL WORK
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cfs.13109

Keywords

best interests; child adoption; children's views; focus groups; preparation for adoption; residential care

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study fills the research gap on the perspective of children eligible for adoption by exploring their views on adoption and preparation. The results indicate that children perceive adoption as an opportunity for a better life, but also face challenges that require preparation.
Preparing children for adoption is one of the major goals of the child welfare system. Research on adoption preparation has mainly focused on the perspective of adults, and studies addressing the views of children eligible for adoption are meagre. This study aimed to contribute to filling this gap by exploring the child's perspective on adoption and preparation for adoption. Twenty children aged 9-13 years old (seven girls) and living in residential care institutions, participated in three semi-structured focus group interviews. Thematic analysis of the data revealed three major themes: understanding of adoption, challenges associated with adoption and preparation and other factors that facilitate adoption. The results suggest that children perceive adoption as an opportunity for a better life that involves challenges such as navigating ambivalence, distancing from biological parents and anticipated risks. Preparation for adoption is key to overcome the expected difficulties. We discussed these results considering the importance of prioritizing children's best interests and exploring practical applications of incorporating their perspectives in adoption preparation. Addressing the views of children eligible for adoption may contribute to promoting the quality of child-centred care in adoption preparation practices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available