4.7 Article

On the co-nucleation of adjoining twin pairs at grain boundaries in hexagonal close-packed materials

Journal

SCRIPTA MATERIALIA
Volume 241, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2023.115882

Keywords

Twinning; Twin nucleation; Grain boundaries; Hexagonal close-packed; Mechanical behavior

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work investigates the formation of adjoining twin pairs (ATPs) at grain boundaries (GBs) in hexagonal close-packed (hcp) metals, focusing on the co-nucleation (CN) of pairs of deformation twins. A continuum defect mechanics model is proposed to study the energetic feasibility of CN of ATPs resulting from GB dislocation dissociation. The model reveals that CN is preferred over the nucleation of a single twin variant for low misorientation angle GBs. Further analysis considering GB character and twin system alignment suggests that CN events could be responsible for ATP formation even at low m' values.
This work addresses the formation of adjoining twin pairs (ATPs) at grain boundaries (GBs) in hexagonal close-packed (hcp) metals from the perspective of the co-nucleation (CN) of pairs of deformation twins. A continuum defect mechanics model is proposed to investigate the energetic feasibility of the CN of ATPs resulting from the dissociation of GB dislocations. Application of the model to a set of GBs in Mg reveals that CN is largely preferred over the nucleation of a single twin variant for low misorientation angle GBs, which is consistent with previous experimental analyses. The CN events are subsequently analyzed considering the GB character, and the twin system alignment (m ') and Schmid factors to obtain better insights into the conditions governing the formation of ATPs via CN. The likelihood of CN even at low m ' values reveals that CN events could be responsible for the formation of ATP pairs in these scenarios.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available