4.8 Article

Enable reversible conversion reaction of copper fluoride batteries by hydroxyl solution and anion acceptor

Journal

ENERGY STORAGE MATERIALS
Volume 64, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2023.103073

Keywords

Hydroxyl-rich fluoride; Cu(I) dissolution; Electrochemical reversibility; Electrolyte modification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metal fluorides as conversion-reaction cathodes have advantages such as low cost, environmentally friendly, and high energy density. In this study, a hydroxyl-rich copper fluoride (Cu2(OH)3F) was proposed as a conversion cathode, coupled with an electrolyte additive engineering, to address the poor reversibility issue. The presence of OH in Cu2(OH)3F enables effective suppression of Cu+ dissolution, resulting in better reaction reversibility and kinetics.
Metal fluorides as conversion-reaction cathodes are attracting more attentions due to their advantages of low cost, environmentally friendly and high energy density. Among CuF2 enables the high theoretical energy density (1874 Wh/kg) and conversion reaction potential (3.55 V vs. Li+/Li), but its poor reversibility is always criticized due to the dissolution of Cu species occurring in delithiation process. In response to this conundrum, here we propose a hydroxyl-rich copper fluoride (Cu2(OH)3F) as conversion cathode coupled with an electrolyte additive engineering to address the reversibility bottleneck. The presence of OH enables the effective suppression of Cu+ dissolution and imparts Cu2(OH)3F a phase-division conversion mechanism, resulting in the better reaction reversibility and kinetics. Combing with the electrolyte formulation based on boron-based anion acceptor with mild Lewis acidity, the dissociation and conversion of anions from Cu2(OH)3F lattices are promoted and hence the cycling performance is further upgraded, with a reversible capacity over 200 mA h/g after 50 cycles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available