4.7 Article

Optimizing material selection: A study of erosion-corrosion performance in homogeneous and carbide-containing materials

Journal

WEAR
Volume 536, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2023.205181

Keywords

Erosion-corrosion; Synergistic effect; WC-Overlays; Chrome white irons; Abrasion-resistant (AR) steel; Pipeline steel; Slurry pot

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Erosion-corrosion is a major factor in material loss and reduced useful life of hydro-transport equipment. This study evaluates the erosion-corrosion characteristics of different materials and finds that matrix wear affects the degradation of carbides. Sufficient wear and corrosion resistance in the surrounding matrix are important for good erosion-corrosion resistance.
Erosion-corrosion is a major factor contributing to material loss and reduced useful life of hydro-transport equipment. The combined effect of erosion and corrosion is responsible for high degradation rates. In oil sand mining, materials from different classes are used for various applications depending on the severity of degra-dation. In this research, we assessed the erosion-corrosion characteristics of four uniform materials (pipeline and abrasion-resistant steels) as well as five materials containing varying types and quantities of carbide (chrome white iron and WC-based overlay). The materials underwent erosion-corrosion testing within a slurry container (comprising 3.5 wt% NaCl + 35 wt% natural silica sand) at a temperature of 45 degrees C. Under the test conditions, it was found that matrix wear influences the extent of carbide degradation for all carbide-containing materials. To provide good erosion-corrosion resistance, the surrounding matrix that supports the carbide must have sufficient wear and corrosion resistance. This study also identifies the dominant wear mechanisms for both uniform and carbide-containing materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available