4.7 Article

Strategy for possible separation of light rare earth elements (La, Ce, Pr, Nd) from synthetic chloride solutions by oxidative precipitation, solvent extraction and stripping

Journal

HYDROMETALLURGY
Volume 224, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2023.106242

Keywords

Light rare earths; Extraction; Separation; Cyanex 572; Stripping

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a hydrometallurgical process for the separation of light rare earth elements (LREEs) using oxidation, precipitation, solvent extraction, and stripping techniques. Selective oxidation with potassium permanganate was employed for the separation of cerium (III). Solvent extraction with Cyanex 572 and cross-current scrubbing were used to achieve the separation of lanthanum (III) from neodymium (III) and praseodymium (III).
Due to their comparable physicochemical characteristics, light rare earth elements (LREEs), such as lanthanum (La), cerium (Ce), praseodymium (Pr), and neodymium (Nd), the separation of these elements is a challenging process. In this study, a strategy involving hydrometallurgical unit operations is presented, including oxidation, precipitation, solvent extraction (SX), and stripping. Separation of Ce(III) can be achieved by selective oxidation with potassium permanganate (KMnO4), which is a strong oxidizing agent and proven to be effective in selec-tively precipitating Ce(III). By using solvent extraction with 0.5 mol L-1 of Cyanex 572 at an A/O ratio of 1:3 and four stages in a counter-current configuration, La(III) can be separated from Nd(III) and Pr(III) with 100% and 99% extraction, respectively. Cross-current scrubbing with a low concentration of HCl can be used to remove La (III), which becomes the contaminant that is left in the loaded organic. Other mineral acids, including HNO3, H2SO4, and H3PO4 were also investigated as alternative scrubbing/stripping agents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available