4.7 Article

A sociotechnical framework to assess patient-facing eHealth tools: results of a modified Delphi process

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Health Care Sciences & Services

The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Digital Health-Seeking Behavior: Big Data Interrupted Time-Series Analysis of Google Trends

Robin van Kessel et al.

Summary: This study analyzed the changes in public interest in digital health during the COVID-19 pandemic using Google Trends data. The results showed that there was an immediate increase in digital health searches after the declaration of COVID-19 as a pandemic, but the interest declined afterwards, sometimes returning to pre-pandemic levels. Overall, the increased public interest in digital health was not sustained, indicating the presence of structural barriers. Therefore, further development of digital health capacity and establishment of robust digital health governance frameworks are crucial for sustainable digital health transformation.

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH (2023)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Intervention-related, contextual and personal factors affecting the implementation of an evidence-based digital system for prevention and treatment of malnutrition in elderly institutionalized patients: a qualitative study

Cecilie Varsi et al.

Summary: This study explored the experiences of nursing staff regarding the implementation of the 'MyFood' decision support system in settings treating elderly patients. Nursing staff experienced several advantages, but the leadership engagement was low and the implementation was hampered. Future improvements include increasing training, using MyFood throughout the patient course, and involving the patient's next-of-kin.

BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH (2023)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

iCHECK-DH: Guidelines and Checklist for the Reporting on Digital Health Implementations

Caroline Perrin Franck et al.

Summary: A group of global experts has developed the iCHECK-DH guidelines and checklist to improve the completeness of reporting on digital health implementations. The checklist was pilot-tested on real-world projects and adjusted based on feedback received. The result is a 20-item checklist with detailed explanations and examples. Widespread adoption of the checklist is expected to standardize reporting quality and improve implementation standards.

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH (2023)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Mobile Health Self-management Support for Spinal Cord Injury: Systematic Literature Review

Renaldo M. Bernard et al.

Summary: This systematic literature review provides a comprehensive description of the characteristics and approaches of mobile health (mHealth) self-management support tools for spinal cord injury (SCI). The study reveals that existing tools focus on common SCI self-management areas and overlook important aspects. The findings emphasize the need for increased coverage of key self-management components and more detailed reporting to support the selection, development, and improvement of mHealth tools for SCI.

JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH (2023)

Editorial Material Psychiatry

Focusing on Digital Research Priorities for Advancing the Access and Quality of Mental Health

John Torous et al.

Summary: Digital mental health solutions are recognized as crucial for addressing the global mental health crisis. Research shows that various solutions, including therapy programs, virtual reality headsets, smartphone apps, and chatbots, have the potential to improve mental health. However, further research is needed to assess their equity, validity, effectiveness, implementation feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and efficacy. This paper outlines key areas for the future research and introduces the partnership between JMIR Publications and the Society of Digital Psychiatry to advance these goals.

JMIR MENTAL HEALTH (2023)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

The impact of technology systems and level of support in digital mental health interventions: a secondary meta-analysis

Maxime Sasseville et al.

Summary: This study conducted a meta-analysis of digital mental health interventions for people with comorbid physical and mental chronic diseases. The results showed that online messaging was the most effective technology to improve anxiety and depression scores, and interventions partially supported by healthcare professionals were more effective than self-administered.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2023)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Rating analysis and BERTopic modeling of consumer versus regulated mHealth app reviews in Germany

Marie Uncovska et al.

Summary: Germany introduced prescription-based mobile health (mHealth) apps, known as DiGAs, which are fully reimbursed by health insurance. This study compares the user experience of DiGAs with non-prescription mHealth apps in Germany, analyzing app store ratings and written reviews. Results show that DiGAs receive higher ratings and positive sentiment, with factors such as customer service and ease of use contributing to a positive user experience.

NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE (2023)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Rigorous and rapid evidence assessment in digital health with the evidence DEFINED framework

Jordan O. Silberman et al.

Summary: Numerous frameworks have been proposed for assessing the evidence of digital health interventions, but they may not meet the needs of stakeholder organizations. In response, a framework called Evidence DEFINED is proposed, which aims to provide a rigorous and rapid assessment of digital health evidence. It includes unique elements designed for rigor and speed, and addresses gaps in prior frameworks.

NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE (2023)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Assessing the Quality and Impact of eHealth Tools: Systematic Literature Review and Narrative Synthesis

Christine Jacob et al.

Summary: This review investigates the different approaches and criteria used to assess the quality and impact of eHealth tools, considering sociotechnical factors. It identifies 36 unique criteria grouped into technical, social, and organizational assessment categories. The study highlights the lack of a uniform framework for evaluating eHealth tools, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive approach that considers the complexity and interdependence of the healthcare ecosystem.

JMIR HUMAN FACTORS (2023)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Patient and Provider Predictors of Telemental Health Use Prior to and During the COVID-19 Pandemic Within the Department of Veterans Affairs

Samantha L. Connolly et al.

Summary: The study identified a digital divide in mental health services, with factors such as older age, lower income patients, older providers, and nonpsychologists being less likely to engage in video care. Strategies are needed to address barriers and ensure equitable access to video MH services.

AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST (2022)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Sociotechnical Factors Affecting Patients' Adoption of Mobile Health Tools: Systematic Literature Review and Narrative Synthesis

Christine Jacob et al.

Summary: This review investigates the factors affecting patients' adoption of mHealth tools, including technical factors, health-related factors, and social and personal factors. The results indicate that considering these factors and developing appropriate strategies is essential to promote mHealth adoption.

JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH (2022)

Article Health Policy & Services

The regulatory gap in digital health and alternative pathways to bridge it

Jeffrey David Iqbal et al.

Summary: Regulatory gaps in the market of digital health technologies pose a threat to patient-consumers, with alternatives to regulatory agency-based assessments evaluated as potential solutions.

HEALTH POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY (2022)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

From Testers to Cocreators-the Value of and Approaches to Successful Patient Engagement in the Development of eHealth Solutions: Qualitative Expert Interview Study

Christine Jacob et al.

Summary: This study aims to understand the challenges and opportunities in engaging patients in eHealth development and proposes solutions to overcome the identified gaps. The study found that patient engagement is crucial for providing different types of value, but patients are often engaged too late in the development process and only serve as testers. Barriers to patient engagement include compliance risks, patient-related factors, power dynamics, and mistrust. However, engaging through partners, involving professional patient experts, and embedding patients in development teams are facilitators for better patient engagement.

JMIR HUMAN FACTORS (2022)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Mobile app validation: a digital health scorecard approach

Ramy Sedhom et al.

Summary: The development of digital health solutions is growing rapidly, but the lack of standardized quality assessment lags behind; Low barriers to development of mobile health apps has led to a crowded and confusing market with low user satisfaction; Research found technical limitations and limited clinical value in mobile health apps, highlighting the need for transparent and standardized evaluation to improve mobile health quality.

NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE (2021)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Physicians' Attitudes Toward Prescribable mHealth Apps and Implications for Adoption in Germany: Mixed Methods Study

Florian Dahlhausen et al.

Summary: The study investigated the current attitudes of physicians and psychotherapists in Germany towards mHealth apps, finding that while the majority supported the prescription opportunity for DiGA, only 30.3% planned to actually prescribe. Barriers include lack of information, reimbursement issues, insufficient medical evidence, legal and technological uncertainties.

JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH (2021)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Tools for Evaluating the Content, Efficacy, and Usability of Mobile Health Apps According to the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments: Systematic Review

Antonio Muro-Culebras et al.

Summary: The study analyzed the quality of tools used to measure the quality of mHealth apps according to the COSMIN guideline, identifying suitable tools for evaluating mHealth app quality by screening validation studies including psychometric properties.

JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH (2021)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Information Quality Frameworks for Digital Health Technologies: Systematic Review

Kayode Philip Fadahunsi et al.

Summary: This study presents the CLIQ framework for digital health through a systematic review, which includes 13 unique dimensions covering various aspects of digital health information, aiding in the evaluation of information quality issues related to digital health.

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH (2021)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Evaluating evaluation frameworks: a scoping review of frameworks for assessing health apps

Sarah Lagan et al.

Summary: With the increasing number of app evaluation frameworks, users are finding it challenging to select appropriate evaluation tools and health apps. This review compares what different app evaluation frameworks offer, identifies converging trends in the field, and highlights new priorities for enhancing clinical guidance.

BMJ OPEN (2021)

Article Psychology, Clinical

Evaluating the quality and safety of health-related apps and e-tools: Adapting the Mobile App Rating Scale and developing a quality assurance protocol

Anna E. Roberts et al.

Summary: Apps and e-tools have great potential as mental health intervention tools, but it's important to have a way to evaluate their quality and safety. This study adapted the MARS to evaluate these tools, tested its reliability, and developed a quality assurance protocol. The A-MARS was shown to be reliable, but the training and skill required to use it effectively may be a barrier.

INTERNET INTERVENTIONS-THE APPLICATION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN MENTAL AND BEHAVIOURAL HEALTH (2021)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

How Should Oncologists Choose an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome System for Remote Monitoring of Patients With Cancer?

Fabrice Denis et al.

Summary: When choosing an ePRO system for cancer patients, clinicians should ask software providers about the effectiveness, safety, and functionality of the system to obtain the best tools for their patients and practice.

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH (2021)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

A process for reviewing mental health apps: Using the One Mind PsyberGuide Credibility Rating System

Martha Neary et al.

Summary: This paper discusses the challenges and opportunities of current mental health app rating systems, and describes the refinement process of One Mind PsyberGuide Credibility Rating Scale (PGCRS). The study developed PGCRS Version 2 through multiple stages, reviewed 161 mental health apps, and updated ratings on the public app guide.

DIGITAL HEALTH (2021)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

The NICE Evidence Standards Framework for digital health and care technologies - Developing and maintaining an innovative evidence framework with global impact

Harriet Unsworth et al.

Summary: The ESF is a standardized framework developed in 2018 by NICE in partnership with various UK health organizations to guide developers and commissioners on the evidence levels required for evaluating DHTs. The framework has been well-received and has had a significant impact globally, with ongoing efforts to maintain and improve it in a rapidly evolving field.

DIGITAL HEALTH (2021)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Insights from user reviews to improve mental health apps

Felwah Alqahtani et al.

HEALTH INFORMATICS JOURNAL (2020)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Health technology assessment frameworks for eHealth: A systematic review

Christiaan Vis et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE (2020)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Understanding Clinicians' Adoption of Mobile Health Tools: A Qualitative Review of the Most Used Frameworks

Christine Jacob et al.

JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH (2020)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Evaluation Criteria for Weight Management Apps: Validation Using a Modified Delphi Process

Noemi Robles et al.

JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH (2020)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Delphi Technique in Health Sciences: A Map

Marlen Niederberger et al.

FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH (2020)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

By the numbers: ratings and utilization of behavioral health mobile applications

Andrew D. Carlo et al.

NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE (2019)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Digital health: a path to validation

Simon C. Mathews et al.

NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE (2019)

Proceedings Paper Computer Science, Cybernetics

Electronic Health Records Are More Than a Work Tool Conflicting Needs of Direct and Indirect Stakeholders

Asa Cajander et al.

CHI 2019: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (2019)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Assessing the Privacy of mHealth Apps for Self-Tracking: Heuristic Evaluation Approach

Luke Hutton et al.

JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH (2018)

Article Education, Scientific Disciplines

Mobile Apps for the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH): App Quality Evaluation

Kristen Nicole DiFilippo et al.

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION EDUCATION AND BEHAVIOR (2018)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

An Assessment Framework for e-Mental Health Apps in Canada: Results of a Modified Delphi Process

Jennifer Zelmer et al.

JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH (2018)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

A Path to Better-Quality mHealth Apps

Richard S. Larson

JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH (2018)

Article Psychology, Clinical

State of the Field of Mental Health Apps

Martha Neary et al.

COGNITIVE AND BEHAVIORAL PRACTICE (2018)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

MedAd-AppQ: A quality assessment tool for medication adherence apps on iOS and android platforms

Eskinder Eshetu Ali et al.

RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY (2018)

Review Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Digital Technologies for Health Workforce Development in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review

Lesley-Anne Long et al.

GLOBAL HEALTH-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE (2018)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Enlight: A Comprehensive Quality and Therapeutic Potential Evaluation Tool for Mobile and Web-Based eHealth Interventions

Amit Baumel et al.

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH (2017)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

mHealth Assessment: Conceptualization of a Global Framework

Meghan Bradway et al.

JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH (2017)

Article Business

Quality Assessment Framework for Mobile Health Systems

Mohammad Naghizadeh et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF E-BUSINESS RESEARCH (2017)

Review Psychology, Clinical

Anxiety: There is an app for that. A systematic review of anxiety apps

Madalina Sucala et al.

DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY (2017)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

The evolution of mobile apps for asthma: an updated systematic assessment of content and tools

Kit Huckvale et al.

BMC MEDICINE (2015)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Mobile App Rating Scale: A New Tool for Assessing the Quality of Health Mobile Apps

Stoyan R. Stoyanov et al.

JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH (2015)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

David Moher et al.

PLOS MEDICINE (2009)

Article Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism

Moving Best Practice Forward: Delphi Characteristics, Advantages, Potential Problems, and Solutions

Holly M. Donohoe et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TOURISM RESEARCH (2009)

Review Pharmacology & Pharmacy

Origin and uses of primum non nocere -: Above all, do no harm!

CM Smith

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY (2005)