Journal
JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOLOGY EDUCATION
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/jmbe.00140-23
Keywords
CURE; self-efficacy; science identity; microbiology
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) increase student participation in research and have a positive impact on their scientific identity and self-efficacy. This study found that students' self-efficacy and science identity significantly increased after completing CUREs, and their self-assessed skills in research and laboratory science also improved.
Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) provide opportunities for undergraduate students to engage in authentic research and generally increase the participation rate of students in research. Students' participation in research has a positive impact on their science identity and self-efficacy, both of which can predict integration of students in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM), especially for underrepresented students. The main goal of this study was to investigate instructor-initiated CUREs implemented as upper-level elective courses in the Biomedical Sciences major. We hypothesized that these CUREs would (i) have a positive impact on students' scientific identity and self-efficacy and (ii) result in gains in students' self-assessed skills in laboratory science, research, and science communication. We used Likert-type surveys developed by Estrada et al. (14) under the Tripartite Integration Model of Social Influence to measure scientific identity, self-efficacy, and scientific value orientation. When data from all CUREs were combined, our results indicate that students' self-efficacy and science identity significantly increased after completion. Students' self-assessment of research and lab-related skills was significantly higher after completion of the CUREs. We also observed that prior to participation in the CUREs, students' self-assessment of molecular and bioinformatic skills was low, when compared with microbiological skills. This may indicate strengths and gaps in our curriculum that could be explored further.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available