4.7 Article

Approximating outcome probabilities of linear optical circuits

Journal

NPJ QUANTUM INFORMATION
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41534-023-00791-9

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quasiprobability representations are important for analyzing quantum systems, and we propose classical algorithms for approximating outcome probabilities of a linear optical circuit. By modulating the shapes of quasiprobability distributions, we can reduce the negativity bound of the circuit and provide efficient estimation of outcome probabilities. Additionally, our algorithms can be used to approximate various matrix functions.
Quasiprobability representations are important tools for analyzing a quantum system, such as a quantum state or a quantum circuit. In this work, we propose classical algorithms specialized for approximating outcome probabilities of a linear optical circuit using quasiprobability distributions. Notably, we can reduce the negativity bound of a circuit from exponential to at most polynomial for specific cases by modulating the shapes of quasiprobability distributions thanks to the symmetry of the linear optical transformation in the phase space. Consequently, our scheme provides an efficient estimation of outcome probabilities within an additive-error whose precision depends on the classicality of the input state. When the classicality is high enough, we reach a polynomial-time estimation algorithm of a probability within a multiplicative-error by an efficient sampling from a log-concave function. By choosing appropriate input states and measurements, our results provide plenty of quantum-inspired classical algorithms for approximating various matrix functions beating best-known results. Moreover, we give sufficient conditions for the classical simulability of Gaussian Boson sampling using our approximating algorithm for any (marginal) outcome probability under the poly-sparse condition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available