Journal
PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11098-023-02071-w
Keywords
Verifiability; Confirmation; Meaning; Context-change potential; Pragmatism; Probability
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This paper argues for a revised version of the Verifiability Criterion, supported by probabilities and the potential for meaning as context change. It discusses the logical validity of the argument and its implications for potential applications of the criterion. The paper also highlights the relativity of meaning to language and probability, suggesting that different parameter choices may result in different judgments on meaning.
The aim of this paper is to argue for a revised and precisified version of the infamous Verifiability Criterion for the meaningfulness of declarative sentences. The argument is based on independently plausible premises concerning probabilistic confirmation and meaning as context-change potential, it is shown to be logically valid, and its ramifications for potential applications of the criterion are being discussed. Although the paper is not historical but systematic, the criterion thus vindicated will resemble the original one(s) in some important ways. At the same time, it will also be more modest insofar as meaningfulness will turn out to be relativized linguistically and probabilistically, and different choices of the linguistic and probabilistic parameters may lead to different verdicts on meaningfulness.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available