4.6 Article

Driving-related cognitive skills during antidepressant transcranial direct current stimulation: results in a subsample from the DepressionDC trial

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1255415

Keywords

major depressive disorder; transcranial direct current stimulation; tDCS; depression; driving performance

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assessed the impact of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on driving-related cognitive skills in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). The results showed that repeated sessions of tDCS did not negatively affect driving-related cognitive skills in MDD patients.
Therapeutic transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a well-tolerated neuromodulatory intervention. However, there are currently no data on its impact on driving skills. Therefore, we conducted a validated assessment of driving-related cognitive skills in participants of the DepressionDC trial, a multicenter, randomized-controlled trial investigating the antidepressant effects of 6-week prefrontal tDCS in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Twenty-one patients (12 women, active tDCS, n = 11, sham, n = 10) underwent an assessment of driving-related cognitive skills before and after the intervention. Using a Bayesian analysis approach, we found no group differences between active tDCS and sham tDCS in the pre-post treatment changes for visual perception (estimated median difference: 3.41 [-3.17, 10.55 89%-CI], BF01: 2.1), stress tolerance (estimated median difference: 0.77 [-2.40, 4.15 89%-CI], BF01: 1.6), and reaction time (estimated median difference: 2.06 [-12.33, 16.83 89%-CI], BF01: 6.5). Our results indicate that repeated sessions of a conventional bifrontal tDCS protocol do not negatively impact driving-related cognitive skills in patients with MDD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available