Friend or Foe? Rethinking Epistemic Trespassing

In this paper, we reconsider the notion of epistemic trespassing and attempt to explore possible scenarios in which it could lead to positive outcomes in scientific research and information dissemination. As we will point out, some of the significant discoveries in the history of science would not have been possible were it not for the epistemic trespassers, whose shift in paradigm changed the approach to specific issues for the better. Furthermore, we will present instances where individuals, often labeled as 'trespassers' - those who venture into fields outside their expertise - can be considered trustworthy and reliable sources of testimony. Consequently, epistemic trespassing turned out to be essential for the advancement of science. Epistemic trespassing in our age is virtually inevitable - whether it be from a political perspective (to preserve democratic values) or due to purely practical reasons (i.e. searching for information online). There are interdisciplinary fields where a strictly negative characterization of epistemic trespassing would question their methodology since these disciplines rely on experts from various fields. For these reasons, we advocate for a more charitable approach to epistemic trespassing and greater public education to help them distinguish between correct and false information.

Automated summary

This paper reconsiders the concept of epistemic trespassing and explores potential positive outcomes in scientific research and information dissemination. The author argues that epistemic trespassers have played a crucial role in significant scientific discoveries and can be reliable sources of testimony. It advocates for a more charitable approach to epistemic trespassing and emphasizes the importance of public education to distinguish between correct and false information.