4.7 Article

The fuzzy human-robot collaboration assembly line balancing problem

Journal

COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
Volume 187, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2023.109774

Keywords

Assembly line balancing; Human-robot collaboration; Fuzzy times; Bi-objective optimization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses the assembly line balancing problem in production lines with collaborative robots. Collaborative robots have the potential to improve automation, productivity, accuracy, and flexibility in manufacturing. The article explores the use of a problem-specific metaheuristic to solve this complex problem under uncertainty.
Consideration is given to the assembly line balancing problem (ALBP) in production lines employed collaborative robots. Human-robot collaboration promises high advantages in manufacturing regarding automation, productivity, accuracy as well as flexibility in production. This technology is really challenging but requires redesigning of assembly lines to effectively involve the available human- and robot-resources. As robots can collaborate with humans sharing the assembly tasks in the same workstation, production managers experience an increasingly complex ALBP setting. Moreover, a crucial issue raised within this context is the variance and uncertainty in processing times for manual (human) work. Processing times for human work are subject to the nature and skills of the human worker. We explore the heuristic solution of this NP-hard problem using a problem-specific metaheuristic. Our aim is to investigate the effects of utilizing collaborate robots in manual assembly lines with respect to both production rate and workload smoothing. Simulation experiments on a reallife case study borrowed from the literature show how to tackle the problem under uncertainty (fuzziness) in task processing times.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available