4.5 Article

Multi-block alternating direction method of multipliers for ultrahigh dimensional quantile fused regression

Journal

COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS
Volume 192, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2023.107901

Keywords

Fused LASSO; Multi-block ADMM; Oracle properties; Quantile regression

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a model that combines quantile regression and fused LASSO penalty, and introduces an iterative algorithm based on ADMM to solve high-dimensional datasets. The paper proves the global convergence and comparable convergence rates of the algorithm, and analyzes the theoretical properties of the model. Numerical experimental results support the superior performance of the model.
In this paper, we consider a quantile fused LASSO regression model that combines quantile regression loss with the fused LASSO penalty. Intuitively, this model offers robustness to outliers, thanks to the quantile regression, while also effectively recovering sparse and block coefficients through the fused LASSO penalty. To adapt our proposed method for ultrahigh dimensional datasets, we introduce an iterative algorithm based on the multi-block alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM). Moreover, we demonstrate the global convergence of the algorithm and derive comparable convergence rates. Importantly, our ADMM algorithm can be easily applied to solve various existing fused LASSO models. In terms of theoretical analysis, we establish that the quantile fused LASSO can achieve near oracle properties with a practical penalty parameter, and additionally, it possesses a sure screening property under a wide class of error distributions. The numerical experimental results support our claims, showing that the quantile fused LASSO outperforms existing fused regression models in robustness, particularly under heavy-tailed distributions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available