4.7 Article

An exponential strength degradation model for clay: From mathematical model to numerical application

Journal

OCEAN ENGINEERING
Volume 290, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.116339

Keywords

Clay; Strength degradation model; Cyclic penetration tests; Finite element analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Investigation into the strain-softening behavior of clay is crucial for offshore geotechnical engineering. This study proposes an exponential strength degradation model and verifies its accuracy by comparing it with other models. The effectiveness of the model is confirmed through a finite element analysis of pipe-clay interaction. Accurately evaluating the degradation of undrained shear strength of clay is essential.
Investigation in strain-softening behavior of clay is of great significance for offshore geotechnical engineering. Although several models could be used to characterize the degradation of undrained shear strength of clay with cumulative shear strain, it is necessary to improve accuracy of them. In this study, based on full-flow cyclic penetration test, an exponential strength degradation model with one parameter alpha is proposed, where alpha is the function of the fully remolded resistance factor and the ratio of initial extraction to initial penetration resistance. The reliability of the proposed model is verified by comparing indices (strength and sensitivity) calculated by it and by other existing strain-softening models. In addition, a large deformation finite element (LDFE) analysis based on the proposed model is conducted for pipe-clay interaction, and efficiency of the model is verified by comparing numerical results with centrifuge test results. The influence of alpha on the normalized penetration resistance were discussed, and demonstrate the necessity of accurately evaluating degradation of undrained shear strength of clay.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available