4.8 Article

Improving biomass yields of microalgae biofilm by coculturing two microalgae species via forming biofilms with uniform microstructures and small cell-clusters

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 393, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.130052

Keywords

Microalgal biofilm; Microalgae-microalgae coculture; Biofilm microstructure; Cell morphology; Cell surface property

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The coculture of microalgae has the potential to promote the growth of microalgae biofilms. This study found that biomass yields can decrease when the biofilm porosity decreases, but can increase when the cocultured biofilms have a uniform microstructure and small cell-clusters. Analysis of cell morphologies and surface properties revealed that cells with small size, spherical shape, and reduced surface polymers can hinder the formation of cell-clusters, thereby promoting biomass yields.
Microalgae coculture has the potential to promote microalgae biofilm growth. Herein, three two-species cocultured biofilms were studied by determining biomass yields and detailed microstructure parameters, including porosity, average pore length, average cluster length, etc. It was found that biomass yields could reduce by 21-53 % when biofilm porosities decreased from about 35 % to 20 %; while at similar porosities (-20 %), biomass yields of cocultured biofilms increased by 37 % when they possessed uniform microstructure and small cell-clusters (pores and clusters of 1 - 10 mu m accounted for 96 % and 68 %, respectively). By analyzing morphologies and surface properties of cells, it was found that cells with small size, spherical shape, and reduced surface polymers could hinder the cell-clusters formation, thereby promoting biomass yields. The study provides new insights into choosing cocultured microalgae species for improving the biomass yield of biofilm via manipulating biofilm microstructures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available