4.7 Article

Fast responding and highly selective chemoresistive humidity sensor based on hydrated V2O5 nanobelts for real-time breath monitoring

Journal

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
Volume 401, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2023.135034

Keywords

Humidity sensor; Hydrated vanadium pentoxide; Nanobelt; Chemoresistive; Real-time breath monitoring

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chemoresistive humidity sensors based on ultrathin V2O5•nH2O nanobelts show promising performance in real-time breath monitoring, with rapid response and recovery, as well as excellent selectivity to humidity.
Chemoresistive humidity sensors have gained massive attraction owing to the high potential for application in real-time breath monitoring. Herein, we introduce a chemoresistive humidity sensor based on ultrathin V2O5 & sdot;nH2O nanobelts (NBs) prepared by liquid-phase exfoliation. Due to the layered structure, water molecules were embedded between layers, increasing the active surface area. Moreover, the multivalent vanadium states and oxygen vacancies are highly beneficial to increasing the adsorption sites in gas sensing reactions. V2O5 & sdot;nH2O NBs exhibited promising humidity sensing properties examined by exposure to 50% relative humidity (RH). The response and recovery time to 50% RH was 21 s and 356 s, respectively, with stable and reliable sensing behaviors to repetitive exposure to humid air. The response to 50% RH was 27 times higher than the response to interference gas, indicating the outstanding selectivity to humidity. The theoretical detection limit was 0.55% RH, showing linear response increase with humidity concentration. The response degradation was marginal even after 3 weeks of relaxation, showing high stability. The breath monitoring experiment reveals extremely rapid response and recovery to exhaled breath, enlarging the suitability for a real-time breath monitoring platform.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available