4.5 Article

Multiscale modeling of shape memory polymers foams nanocomposites

Journal

COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE
Volume 232, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112658

Keywords

Shape memory polymers; Nanocomposite; Multiscale modeling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Shape memory polymer foams (SMPFs) are lightweight cellular materials that can recover their undeformed shape through external stimulation. Reinforcing the material with nano-clay filler improves its physical properties. Multiscale modeling techniques can be used to study the thermomechanical response of SMPFs and show good agreement with experimental results.
Shape memory polymer foams (SMPFs) are defined as lightweight cellular materials with the ability to recover their undeformed shape by applying an external stimulus like light, temperature, magnetic field, etc. Reinforcement of the material with nano-clay filler leads to a significant improvement in its physical properties. As a result, a wide range of applications is occupied by SMPFs, especially in industry and biomedical applications. Because of the heterogeneous nature of the SMPFs at different scale levels, modeling the material with one scale numerical model which able to capture all the effects of the lower scale material structure is really a complex task. Within this work, a full multiscale modeling approach is employed to investigate the thermomechanical response of the SMPFs. Furthermore, a combination of the 3D Representative Volume Element (RVE) and finite element method is used to explore the effects of the nano-filler weight fractions and the material's cellular structure at different length scales on the material dynamics. The multiscale modeling process gives great and promising results with good agreement with the experimental results. Moreover, the model shows relatively high sensitivity parameters that are initiated from the lower scale level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available