4.4 Article

#mybestmidlife: Profiles of photo-based social media use and body image among midlife women

Journal

BODY IMAGE
Volume 48, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2023.101646

Keywords

Body image; Social media; Midlife; Body positive; Photo; Cluster

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the risk of appearance concerns among midlife women using photo-based social media and identified different risk profiles. The findings suggested that higher social media use was associated with greater perceived negative effects of social media.
Empirical data, predominantly from young women, suggest photo-based social media use is associated with greater body dissatisfaction. The present study aimed to extend these findings to midlife women and identify risk profiles for maladaptive appearance-focused social media use. A convenience sample of female Instagram users aged 40 or over (M= 50.92 years) (n = 192) was collected. Most participants were partnered, white, highly educated, and heterosexual. A cluster analysis in cross-sectional data grouped participants into four categories according to body image indices (following body positive or fitness accounts, body appreciation and dissatisfaction, thin and muscular ideal internalization, and appearance comparison). Differences by cluster emerged according to indices of social media use (e.g., photo editing, social media rumination), although following appearance-related content across types seemed to distinguish risk profiles more than the types of appearancerelated content engaged with (i.e., body positive vs fitness). Furthermore, results indicated that higher social media use was associated with greater perceived negative effects of social media, suggesting that awareness alone may be insufficient to reduce behavioral risk. Findings indicate that some midlife women who use photobased social media may be at high risk for appearance concerns, warranting further research and resource development for this group.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available