4.7 Article

PoreGlow: A split green fluorescent protein-based system for rapid detection of Listeria monocytogenes

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 438, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.138043

Keywords

Listeriosis; Green fluorescent protein; PoreGlow; Listeriolysin O; Rapid detection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The PoreGlow system based on split green fluorescent protein (GFP) was developed and assessed for the rapid and accurate detection of L. monocytogenes. It showed high sensitivity and specificity, with no cross-reactivity with other bacteria. This system is promising for the early detection of L. monocytogenes in food products, which is crucial for preventing outbreaks and protecting public health.
Listeria monocytogenes, a severe foodborne pathogen causing severe diseases underscores the necessity for the development of a detection system with high specificity, sensitivity and utility. Herein, the PoreGlow system, based on split green fluorescent protein (GFP), was developed and assessed for the fast and accurate detection of L. monocytogenes. Split GFP-encapsulated liposomes were optimized for targeted analysis. The system utilizes listeriolysin O (LLO), a toxin produced by L. monocytogenes that enlarges the pores split GFP-encapsulated liposomes, to detect L. monocytogenes by measuring the fluorescent signal generated when the encapsulated GFP is released and reacted with the externally added fragment of the split GFP. The system exhibited a limit of detection of 0.17 mu g/ml for LLO toxin and 10 CFU/mL for L. monocytogenes with high sensitivity and specificity and no cross-reactivity with other bacteria. The PoreGlow system is practical, rapid, and does not require sample pre-treatment, making it a promising tool for the early detection of L. monocytogenes in food products, which is crucial for preventing outbreaks and protecting public health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available