4.7 Article

Interpretable and intervenable ultrasonography-based machine learning models for pediatric appendicitis

Journal

MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS
Volume 91, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2023.103042

Keywords

Interpretable machine learning; Multiview learning; Concepts; Classification; Pediatric appendicitis; Ultrasound imaging

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents interpretable machine learning models for predicting the diagnosis, management, and severity of suspected appendicitis using ultrasound images. The proposed models utilize concept bottleneck models (CBM) that facilitate interpretation and intervention by clinicians, without compromising performance or requiring time-consuming image annotation.
Appendicitis is among the most frequent reasons for pediatric abdominal surgeries. Previous decision support systems for appendicitis have focused on clinical, laboratory, scoring, and computed tomography data and have ignored abdominal ultrasound, despite its noninvasive nature and widespread availability. In this work, we present interpretable machine learning models for predicting the diagnosis, management and severity of suspected appendicitis using ultrasound images. Our approach utilizes concept bottleneck models (CBM) that facilitate interpretation and interaction with high-level concepts understandable to clinicians. Furthermore, we extend CBMs to prediction problems with multiple views and incomplete concept sets. Our models were trained on a dataset comprising 579 pediatric patients with 1709 ultrasound images accompanied by clinical and laboratory data. Results show that our proposed method enables clinicians to utilize a human-understandable and intervenable predictive model without compromising performance or requiring time-consuming image annotation when deployed. For predicting the diagnosis, the extended multiview CBM attained an AUROC of 0.80 and an AUPR of 0.92, performing comparably to similar black-box neural networks trained and tested on the same dataset.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available