4.7 Article

Causal foreign market selection and effectual entry decision-making: The mediating role of collaboration to enhance international performance

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH
Volume 172, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114385

Keywords

Foreign market entry; Causation; Effectuation; Network approach; International performance

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Foreign market selection and entry are important decisions for internationalizing SMEs as they involve uncertainty and influence performance. This study contributes to the field by proposing a model that explains SMEs' international performance through causal and effectual logic, as well as business network theory.
Foreign market selection and entry are important decisions for internationalizing small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) because they involve uncertainty, and influence performance. While it is inherent in effectual foreign market entry (FME) decision-making to rely on international partners and relationships to develop international markets, causal foreign market selection and business relationships/networks have frequently been presented as alternative ways to expand abroad. We conceive SMEs' foreign market selection and entry as international business decisions and build on causal and effectual logic, and business network theory, to propose a model explaining SMEs' international performance. We contribute to international business and SME literature by uncovering two different paths (causal and effectual) to FME collaboration and international performance. FME collaboration mediates the relation between causal foreign market selection and effectual entry decisionmaking and international performance. Our theoretical explanation for the mediating mechanism through which international performance can be enhanced is the network approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available