3.8 Article

Algorithmic sovereignty: Machine learning, ground truth, and the state of exception

Journal

PHILOSOPHY & SOCIAL CRITICISM
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/01914537231222885

Keywords

algorithmic governance; algorithms; artificial intelligence; capitalism; critical theory; security; state of exception; Theodor Adorno; truth

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article explores the interaction between contemporary algorithmic security technology and the political theory of the state of exception. It argues that algorithmic security technology carries exceptions throughout its political and technological architecture. The article concludes that while most machine learning technology reinforces and reproduces the relations of domination, there is still space for it to operate within spaces of political non-identity and support liberatory politics.
This article examines the interplay between contemporary algorithmic security technology and the political theory of the state of exception. I argue that the exception, as both a political and a technological concept, provides a crucial way to understand the power operating through machine learning technologies used in the security apparatuses of the modern state. I highlight how algorithmic security technology, through its inherent technical properties, carries exceptions throughout its political and technological architecture. This leads me to engage with Theodor Adorno's negative dialectics to interrogate the question of 'ground truth' in machine learning. I conclude that most machine learning technology asserts identity between itself and bourgeois reality - and thus inherently reinforces and reproduces the relations of domination entailed in that image of the world. However, space still exists for machine learning to operate within spaces of political non-identity, or exceptions to the bourgeois totality, and aid in liberatory politics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available