The Race to Exclude: Residential Growth Controls in California Cities, 1970-1992

Local regulations that restrict residential growth are a key driver of California's affordable housing crisis. Scholars have argued these growth controls were implemented in the late 20th century by cities intending to exclude Black households. However, growth controls may also have plausibly been driven by a desire to exclude growing Hispanic, Asian, and foreign-born populations; by increased concern about the negative environmental consequences of population growth; or by homeowners' or cities' fiscal motivations. I jointly test these competing explanations using time-varying data on the adoption of a variety of residential growth controls covering California cities from 1970 to 1992. I find that, all else equal, cities with a lower share of Black residents-both in absolute terms, and relative to their metropolitan area-were more likely to pass residential growth controls. I also find some evidence that growth controls were more likely to be passed in areas experiencing greater Black population growth and in cities more supportive of White-Black segregation. Finally, I find strong evidence that, net of other factors, cities in areas more supportive of policies to protect the environment were more likely to pass residential growth controls.

Automated summary

Local regulations that restrict residential growth are considered as a major factor in California's affordable housing crisis. These growth controls might have been implemented to exclude different racial households, to exclude growing Hispanic, Asian, and foreign-born populations, to address concerns about the negative environmental consequences of population growth, or to satisfy homeowners' or cities' fiscal motivations.